论文部分内容阅读
目的 探讨急性心肌梗死的急诊急救护理效果。方法 将新民市人民医院收治的80例急性心肌梗死患者纳入研究对象，时间为2016年3月至2018年8月，随机分组，常规护理组给予常规护理，急诊急救护理组开展急诊急救护理。比较两组的满意度、重症住院时间、急救全程时间，护理前后急性生理与慢性健康评分、左心射血分数、症状自评量表（SCL-90）的相关心理症状指标评分，病死率。结果 急诊急救护理组满意度、急性生理与慢性健康评分、左心射血分数、SCL-90量表的相关心理症状指标评分、重症住院时间、急救全程时间、病死率对比常规“,”Objective To explore the emergency care of acute myocardial infarction. Methods A total of 80 patients with acute myocardial infarction in our hospital from March 2016 to August 2018 were randomly assigned to the routine nursing group and the emergency emergency nursing group. The satisfaction of the two groups was compared. The duration of critical hospitalization and the duration of first aid; Acute physiological and chronic health score， left ventricular ejection fraction， and relevant psychological symptom index score of SCL-90 scale before and after nursing; Mortality rates. Results The satisfaction degree， acute physiological and chronic health score， left ventricular ejection fraction， scores of related psychological symptoms of the SCL-90 scale， duration of intensive hospitalization， duration of first aid， and mortality of the emergency nursing group had advantages over the routine nursing group (P＜0.05). Conclusion The effect of emergency care in patients with acute myocardial infarction is definite.