数字环境下版权授权模式比较研究与完善分析

来源 :法制博览 | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:jiangyingzhou
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
近年来,数字出版尤其是数字图书产业发展迅猛,欣欣向荣,但是版权授权问题却成为悬在数字出版行业上的达摩克利斯之剑,制约行业发展。目前,我国版权授权存在着直接授权、间接授权、要约授权、版权集体管理组织授权、开放式许可等诸多方式,各有利弊。本文通过比较各模式的不足与优势,联系实际,分析认为“授权声明”是解决数字图书发展瓶颈的一种有利模式,但是将集体管理作为核心以提高授权效率和降低授权成本,才是数字版权理想授权方案。 In recent years, digital publishing, especially the digital book industry, has developed rapidly and prosperously. However, the issue of copyright authorization has become the sword of Damocles suspended in the digital publishing industry, restricting the development of the industry. At present, there are many ways in China’s copyright authorization such as direct authorization, indirect authorization, offer authorization, copyright collective management organization authorization and open license, and so on. By comparing the shortcomings and advantages of each mode, the author thinks that “Authorization Statement ” is a favorable mode to solve the bottleneck of the development of digital books, but using collective management as the core to improve the efficiency and reduce the cost of authorization is Digital copyright ideal licensing program.
其他文献
门式起重机广泛用于各种工矿企业、交通运输及建筑施工等部门的露天仓库、货场、车站、码头、建筑工地等露天场所,作为装卸与搬运货物、设备以及建筑构件安装等用。门机是减轻笨重体力劳动,提高作业效率,实现安全生产的起重运输设备,可以在一定范围内垂直起升和水平移动物品.具有动作间歇性和作业循环性的特点,根据门式起重机的不同用选分为通用门式起重机、造船门式起重机和集装箱门式起重机等。  门式起重机主要由门架、小