诸位常常看报,不知道是否有这样的感受:报上的大块评论,往往不如小评论有意果,报纸的一版,往往不如八版或四版即所谓“报屁股”吸引人。“报屁股”常常是以杂文来顶门立户的,大评论则占据一版显要位置。显要处反而无人看,杂文的读者或许要比评论的读者稍微多些。无怪乎仍然是诗人、但如今更热衷于写杂文的邵燕祥君在一次座谈会上半开玩笑地提出:今后是否考虑用杂文来代替社论?我本人是八小时内写社论、八小时外写杂文的,两种行当的甘苦都略知一二。本来,报纸评论是一种极富新闻性、政治性的文字,要敲在亿万人心中绷得最紧的那根弦上,在读者中应该是不乏共鸣或回音的。如今我们却不大能做到这一 You often read the newspaper, do not know whether there is such a feeling: a large comment on the newspaper, often not as good as a small commentary, a newspaper version, often not as good as the eight or four edition of the so-called “ass” attractive. “Newspaper ass ” is often based on essays to set up an account, while the big comment occupy a prominent position. Instead, the highlight is perhaps no more, and the reader of the essay may be slightly more than the reader of the commentary. No wonder it is still a poet, but Shao Yanxiang, who is now more eager to write essays, jokingly said at the symposium half time: whether to consider using essays instead of editorials in the future? I personally wrote editorials within eight hours and wrote essays in eight hours Two kinds of business are bitterly know one or two. Originally, the newspaper commentary was a highly informative and political text. It would have resonated or echoed in readers if it was to be knocked on the tightest string in the hearts of hundreds of millions of people. Now we are not very able to do this