论文部分内容阅读
《史记》自问世以后，历代均有抄写翻刻，但因时代久远，在抄写翻刻过程中，多有衍误脱讹，以至使人产生了“今传《史记》是司马迁原书吗”的疑问。明、清及近代学者对《史记》诸本多有研究，但对西汉末至六朝时期的写本状况甚少涉及，而这一时期对《史记》版本形成至为重要，它能在一定程度上反映出《史记》的原貌。本文以抄于六朝时期的两卷残本为根据，以相关典籍为佐证，揭示了六朝古本的特点，论证了其与今传本的关系，在一定程度上订正了今本《史记》的讹误。
Since the advent of the Records of the Historian, there have been transcribed and transcribed in various dynasties. However, due to the long history of the times, many errors and omissions have taken place in the transcribing and transcribing of the Records of the Historian, resulting in the question of whether or not “Historical Biography of Sima Qian” is Sima Qian’s original book . In the Ming and Qing dynasties, scholars in modern China studied the Records of the Historian for a long time. However, the status of the writing of books from the late Western Han Dynasty to the Six Dynasties was seldom touched upon. This period was of crucial importance to the formation of the version of Records of the Historians. Reflects the original “Historical Records”. Based on the two volumes copied from the period of the Six Dynasties and supported by related books, this paper reveals the characteristics of the ancient books in the Six Dynasties, demonstrates the relationship between the ancient books and the present, and to some extent, corrects the corruption of the present “Historical Records” .