论文部分内容阅读
分析不同的类同义副词的语义差别及其连用次序问题,有必要首先区分严式类同、宽式类同,区分整体性类同、局部性类同,还需要认识到主观指认性有标记类同与常规性类同关系对类同标记词要求的差异。类同副词两项并用、三项并用均存在不可换位、换位后意义改变、换位后基本意义不变等多种情况,这与共时语法化造成的实虚并存相关,也与副词辖域、核心谓词有界无界、句类的现实非现实等因素相关。文中区分“聚焦型强化”“非聚焦型强化”。当核心谓词不具选择性要求时,各司其职的互补型并用转化为多重强化的叠加型并用,原本存在明显差异的异序并用式的语义功能发生中和,但语序选择仍受到篇章连贯和主观凸显因素的约束。
It is necessary to analyze the semantic differences and the order of their conjunction of different kinds of synonymous adverbs. First, it is necessary to distinguish between the same type and the same type, to distinguish between the same type and the same type, and to recognize the subjective signatures The Differences between the Similarity and the Conventional Similarity in the Requirement of the Same Marker. The combination of the same adverb and the adverb of the same type can exist in a variety of situations, such as non-transposition, change of meaning after transposition, change of basic meaning and so on, which is related to the coexistence of real imago caused by grammatical synchronicity, Domain, the core predicate bounded unbounded, the reality of the sentence is not realistic and other factors. The article distinguishes “focusing enhancement ” “non-focusing enhancement”. When the core predicate is not selective, the complements of each division are combined and used as a combination of multiple reinforcements. There is a significant difference in the order and the semantic function of the type is neutralized. However, Subjective factors highlight the constraints.