论文部分内容阅读
广松涉解读马克思《资本论》并不仅仅想澄清《资本论》本身的思想,其最终目的是想揭示全部生活世界的物象化结构。在广松涉看来,古典政治经济学与《资本论》区别的根源就在于两者持有不同的研究立场:“当事者的立场”与“学理的立场”。所谓“从当事者的立场”指的是研究者自觉地将意识与商品交换活动中的当事者保持一致,而“从学理的立场”指的则是研究者自觉地将自己的意识与当事者分离开来。广松涉认为,马克思的《资本论》正是“从学理的立场”出发,并以此为基础阐明了商品世界的四肢结构。在商品世界与其他世界的存在结构的类比中,广松涉进而把四肢结构理论推广为整个生活世界的解释原则,从而揭示了物象化世界的内在结构。这就为我们理解现代社会提供了一个崭新的理论视角。
Guang Song’s interpretation of Marx’s “capital theory” does not just want to clarify the idea of “capitalism” itself, but its ultimate goal is to reveal the visualization structure of the entire life world. From the perspective of Komatsu, the difference between classical political economy and “capitalism” lies in the fact that both hold different positions of research: “the position of the parties concerned” and “the stance of the theory”. The so-called “from the party’s position ” refers to the researchers consciously conscious awareness and commodity exchange activities in line with the parties, and “from the academic position ” refers to the researchers consciously to their own consciousness and Separated from the parties. Guang Song said that Marx’s “theory of capital” just started from the position of his theory and used it as a basis to clarify the limbs and structures of the commodity world. In the analogy of the existing structure of the commodity world with other worlds, Komatsu unveiled the principle of interpretation of the limb-limbs theory as a whole living world, thereby revealing the internal structure of the world of the materialized. This provides a completely new theoretical perspective for our understanding of modern society.