目的探讨经阴道子宫全切术与传统子宫切除手术的优缺点。方法选取2011年2月至2012年6月我院妇科接受子宫全切术患者80例,随机分为观察组与对照组,各40例。观察组患者给予经阴道子宫全切术,对照组患者给予传统手术。比较两组患者治疗效果。结果两组患者均手术成功,观察组40例子宫全切除患者无1例中转经腹手术,且术中出血量明显少于对照组;观察组患者的手术时间与术后镇痛时间均明显少于对照组;观察组患者的总体手术效果优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者术后并发症发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论经阴道子宫全切术疗效明显优于传统手术方法,且并发症少,安全可靠。 Objective To investigate the advantages and disadvantages of transvaginal hysterectomy and conventional hysterectomy. Methods From February 2011 to June 2012, 80 cases of gynecological total hysterectomy in our hospital were randomly divided into observation group and control group, 40 cases each. Patients in the observation group were given vaginal hysterectomy, while patients in the control group were given conventional surgery. Compare the treatment effect of two groups of patients. Results The patients in both groups were operated successfully. None of the 40 cases underwent hysterectomy in the observation group had transabdominal transabdominal surgery, and the amount of bleeding during operation was significantly less than that of the control group. The operation time and postoperative analgesia time in the observation group were significantly less In the control group, the overall surgical effect of the observation group was better than that of the control group, with significant difference (P <0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups (P> 0.05). Conclusion Transvaginal hysterectomy is superior to the traditional surgical methods, and less complications, safe and reliable.