论文部分内容阅读
通知行应重视对信用证真实性的考量,既要以确定表面真实性为主,也要同时兼顾实质真实性,以为后续的安全收汇建立基础。出口来证的真实性是信用证通知的核心,可分为表面真实性与实质真实性两大层面。根据UCP600的规定,通知行仅对出口来证的表面真实性负有责任。在大多数情况下,这一责任可通过SWIFT系统的自动核押、核对印鉴(与银行留底样本比对)等方式来履行。而信用证的实质真实性即是开证行的银行信用及其付款承诺的真实性。对此,基于审慎操作原则和服务客户的立
The notice bank should attach importance to the authenticity of the letter of credit, it is necessary to determine the surface of the authenticity of the main, but also take into account the real authenticity, in order to establish the basis for subsequent security exchange. The authenticity of the export license is the core of the letter of credit notice can be divided into two major aspects of the surface of the real and substantive authenticity. According to the provisions of UCP600, the notification bank is only responsible for the apparent authenticity of the export license. In most cases, this responsibility can be fulfilled through automated verification of the SWIFT system, verification of seals (as opposed to bank-leaving samples), etc. The real authenticity of the letter of credit is the issuing bank’s bank credit and the authenticity of its commitment to payment. In this regard, based on the principle of prudent operation and customer service legislation