论文部分内容阅读
目的 比较倾斜试验与站立试验诊断小儿血管迷走性晕厥的价值。方法 将 78例不明原因晕厥患儿随机分成两组 ,每组各 39例 ,分别行倾斜试验和站立试验。结果 倾斜试验组 8例 (占 2 0 .5% )因不能耐受或不合作而放弃 ,余 31例倾斜试验阳性 18例 ,阳性率 58.1% ;站立试验组 39例均能良好耐受 ,39例中 2 6例为阳性反应 ,阳性率 66.7% ,较倾斜试验组略高 ,但无显著性差异。站立试验组和倾斜试验组阳性反应时血压和心率变化相似 ,两组间比较无显著性差异。结论 站立试验由于试验时间短 ,操作简便 ,更适用于儿童患者
Objective To compare the value of tilt test and standing test in the diagnosis of children with vasovagal syncope. Methods 78 cases of unexplained syncope in children were randomly divided into two groups, 39 cases in each group, respectively, tilt test and stand test. Results Tilt test group of 8 patients (20% .5%) were unable to tolerate or not cooperate to give up, the remaining 31 cases of tilt test was positive in 18 cases, the positive rate of 58.1%; stand test group 39 cases were well tolerated, 39 26 cases were positive, the positive rate was 66.7%, slightly higher than the experimental group was slightly higher, but no significant difference. Blood pressure and heart rate changes were similar in the positive and negative test groups, but there was no significant difference between the two groups. Conclusion Standing test due to short test time, easy to operate, more suitable for children patients