科研课题选择在科研工作中的战略地位是不言而喻的。那么,选题的好坏应以什么标准来衡量呢?人们已熟悉选题的诸项原则和选题方向,但选题能否成立,选题能否中标,这是根本所在,关键是要适合自己的学科优势,去突破一点“单项优势”,找准突破点,方能获得中标的机会。为此,笔者结合多年的工作实践及他人的经验提出几个相关因素。 1“新”的重要 选题的成功与失败,首先要取决一个“新”字,即新思路、新技术、新结论,这三新应贯穿于整个课题的始终。所谓新思路,就是前人没有解决的问题或者是解决不够彻底的,对于国家的一般性课题其研究水准应瞄准国际国内最新动态,重点攻关的课题,应是国内急需解决的难题,对于我们来讲,任务要明 It is self-evident that the scientific research subject should choose the strategic position in the scientific research work. Well, the quality of the topic should be measured by what criteria? People are already familiar with the principles of the topic and the direction of the topic, but the topic can be established, the topic won the bid, this is the fundamental, the key is Suitable for their own academic strengths, to break a little “single advantage”, find a breakthrough point, before being able to win the bid. To this end, the author combines years of work experience and experience of others put forward several relevant factors. The success and failure of a “new” important topic must first depend on a “new” word, that is, new ideas, new technologies and new conclusions. These three new ideas should be run through the entire subject. The so-called new idea is that there are no problems solved by our predecessors or the problems are not thoroughly solved. The research on the general issues of our country should be aimed at the latest developments at home and abroad and the key research topics should be the urgent problems to be solved in our country. For us Speaking, the task should be clear