“惠棟校宋本”這一表述,肇始於阮元《禮記注疏校勘記序》,不僅充斥於阮元的《禮記注疏校勘記》,而且成爲近二百年來令中外《禮記》學界備受關注而又備受困惑的一個熱門議題。核查這數以萬計的校勘記在“惠棟校宋本”中的實際存在情況時,卻發現與“宋本”相合者只是少數,不合者是大多數。本文認爲,問題的癥結在於“惠棟校宋本”是個錯誤的表述。正確的表述應是“惠棟校毛本”。 “The beginning of the school” song “, this statement, originated in Ruan Yuan,” Book of Rites note sparse collation sequence “, not only filled in Ruan Yuan’s” Book of Rites notes sparse notes “, but also for nearly two hundred years so that” Book of Rites “ Concerned and bewildered a hot topic. When verifying the actual existence of tens of thousands of collation records in the ”Songs of Preserving Schools“, we found only a few of them coinciding with ”Song Ben“, and most of them were nonconformities. This article argues that the crux of the problem lies in the ”Song of Wudang School“ is a wrong statement. The correct statement should be ”Wai Tung school hair ".