论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨不同类型农村儿童家庭生态系统的状况及其对儿童自尊的影响。方法:以北京、河南、陕西等地的4951名农村儿童为被试,对流动儿童、留守儿童和普通农村儿童的家庭生态系统进行比较,并使用回归分析探讨父母子系统、家庭环境子系统、家庭关系子系统对儿童子系统:自尊的影响。结果:①三类儿童在父母子系统、家庭环境子系统、家庭关系子系统、儿童子系统上的差异均达到了显著性水平,具体表现为流动儿童家庭生态系统最差,而普通农村儿童家庭生态系统最好。②家庭生态系统对三类儿童自尊的回归分析发现,父子信任显著正向预测流动儿童的自尊;家庭环境子系统、家庭关系子系统显著预测留守儿童的自尊;而父母子系统、家庭环境子系统、家庭关系子系统均显著预测普通农村儿童的自尊。结论:普通农村儿童家庭生态系统较流动儿童、留守儿童更具保护性作用和对不利因素的缓冲作用。
Objectives: To explore the status of family ecology in rural children of different types and their impact on children’s self-esteem. Methods: Using 4951 rural children in Beijing, Henan and Shaanxi as the subjects, the author compared the family ecosystem of migrant children, left-behind children and ordinary rural children, and used regression analysis to explore the relationship between the parents subsystem, family environment subsystem, Family Relationship Subsystem on Children ’s System: The Effect of Self - Esteem. Results: ①The differences of the three types of children in the parent-child system, family environment subsystem, family relationship subsystem and child subsystem all reach the significant level, which is manifested as the worst among the migrant children’s family ecosystem, while the common rural children’s families The best ecosystem. The regression analysis of family ecosystem self-esteem of the three types of children found that father-son trust positively and positively predicted the self-esteem of migrant children; family environment subsystem and family relationship subsystem significantly predicted the self-esteem of left-behind children; while parent subsystem, family environment subsystem , The family relationship subsystem significantly predicted the self-esteem of ordinary rural children. Conclusion: The family ecosystem of ordinary rural children has more protective effect and buffer effect on unfavorable factors than that of floating children and left-behind children.