论文部分内容阅读
保尔·策兰的锁闭性诗学不仅给哲学诠释学也给语文学提出挑战。满足文学理论和套用意识形态的诠释方法将研究者的预设判断强加于文本涵义,而伽达默尔的哲学诠释学则在强调人类普遍经验的同时,忽略了策兰创作的整全性和一贯性。诗学诠释学则行走在公共语境和私人语义、历史真实与个人经验的脊锋上,力图在两者之间保持平衡,注重确定文本涵义方向和倾向;要将具体文本置于不断扩大的视域范围进行考察和理解。在一首诗的具体解释中可以彰显诗学诠释学理念。
Paul Celan’s closed poetics not only gives philosophical hermeneutics but also challenges linguistics. The interpretative method that meets literary theory and applies ideology imposes the preconceived judgment of the researcher on the meaning of the text. However, Gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics, while emphasizing the universal experience of mankind, ignores the completeness of Celan’s writing Consistency. Poetics hermeneutics, on the other hand, strides in the balance between public context, private semantics, historical truth and personal experience in an effort to maintain a balance between the two, focusing on determining the direction and tendencies of textual meanings; placing concrete texts in an ever-expanding Sight range to investigate and understand. In a concrete explanation of a poem can highlight the concept of poetics hermeneutics.