目次一、判例6二、判例7三、判例8四、判例9:宪法诉愿被驳回五、附录1六、附录2一、判例6(一)案件事实第一原告,1977年2月24日生,是第二原告和第三原告的婚生女儿。因为第一原告的母亲(第二原告)在怀孕的第一周里感染了德国麻疹,第一原告的健康受到了侵害。原告诉被告妇科医生没有诊断出母亲的病以终止妊娠,没有进行堕胎行为(即第一原告是女儿,第二原告是母亲,第三原告是丈夫,被告是医生)。 Judgment 6, Judgment 7, Judgment 8 4, Judgment 9: Constitutional Aspirations Dismissed 5, Appendix 1 6, Appendix 2 I. Case 6 (1) Case Facts The First Plaintiff, born on February 24, 1977, Is the second plaintiff and the third plaintiff’s wedding daughter. As the first plaintiff’s mother (second plaintiff) contracted German measles in the first week of pregnancy, the health of the first plaintiff was violated. The original complainant accused gynecologist did not diagnose the mother’s disease to terminate the pregnancy, abortion (the first plaintiff is the daughter, the second plaintiff is the mother, the third plaintiff is the husband, the defendant is the doctor).