论文部分内容阅读
从六十年代末以来,欧美一些物探工作者对复电阻率测量的理论和区分引起激发极化异常源的特性的可能性,进行了许多研究工作,为此研制了各种复电阻率测量仪器,这些仪器所使用的频率范围大约是10~(-2)—10~2Hz。同时,在实验室中对岩石和矿石的电性也进行了大量的测定和研究,所使用的频率范围宽一些,大约是10~(-2)—10~6H_z〔1〕、〔2〕、〔3〕。虽然做了大量的工作,但好象还没有理出头绪来。近年来,国内有的单位也正在研制或已经制成复电阻率仪,并进行了少量试验工作。因此,对复电阻率测量结果的解释问题进行研究,可能是有益的。笔者拟从系统理论观点出发,对复电阻率测量结果的解释问题作初步的探讨。
Since the late 1960s, many geophysical workers in Europe and the United States have carried out many researches on the theory of complex resistivity measurement and the possibility of distinguishing the characteristics of excitation-induced anomalous sources. For this purpose, various complex resistivity measurement instruments , These instruments use the frequency range is about 10 ~ (-2) -10 ~ 2Hz. At the same time, a large number of measurements and studies on the electrical properties of rocks and ores have also been carried out in the laboratory. The frequency range used is a little wider, which is about 10 ~ (-2) -10 ~ 6H_z [1], [2] 〔3〕. Although a lot of work has been done, it seems that I have not figured out the clue. In recent years, some domestic units are also developing or have made complex resistivity meter, and conducted a small amount of test work. Therefore, it may be beneficial to study the interpretation of complex resistivity measurements. The author intends to start from the system theory point of view, the interpretation of complex resistivity measurement results for preliminary discussion.