在很长时间里面,我国建筑理论界讨论的焦点是所谓“民族形式”、“传统建筑”及其与时代、与创新等等的关系,且得出了“在传统的基础上创新”或“在创新的基础上保持传统”等等主张,不一而足。然而很少有人意识到他们把讨论的出发点置于一种错误的逻辑对比之上,即把传统建筑与现代建筑等同起来,把中国建筑和西方建筑等同起来,并把它们作为对立的双方。我们知道,现代建筑运动一方面是现代化生产的产物(亦可称之为产品),它建立在它所适应的物质基础之上。按唯物主义的观点来看, For a long time, the focus of discussions in the field of architectural theorists in China was on the so-called “ethnic forms” and “traditional architecture” and their relationship with the times, innovation, etc., and they came to “innovate on the basis of tradition” or “ Keeping tradition on the basis of innovation, etc. However, few people realize that they put the starting point of the discussion on a wrong logical comparison, that is, equating traditional architecture with modern architecture, equating Chinese architecture with Western architecture, and using them as opposing parties. We know that the modern architectural movement is, on the one hand, a product of modern production (also called product), and it is based on the material basis it adapts to. From a materialist point of view,