论文部分内容阅读
刑法实质解释论,是以人权保障为价值追求的结果导向的解释论,有利于人权保障时才主张突破实定法去追求实质公正,而非偏向社会保护或将其与人权保障等同权衡。该理论具有充分的哲学解释学、法学依据和坚实的现实基础。形式解释论者在法的安定性、国情适应性、实质法治实践史和权力限制缺陷等方面对实质解释论的批评有失偏颇。
The interpretation of substantive interpretation of criminal law is a result-oriented interpretation theory based on the pursuit of human rights protection. When it is conducive to the protection of human rights, it advocates the breakthrough of the substantive law to pursue substantive and impartiality rather than favoring social protection or equating it with guaranteeing human rights. The theory has full philosophical hermeneutics, legal basis and a solid foundation of reality. Formal interpreters have been biased in their criticisms of substantive interpretation in the aspects of the stability of the law, the adaptability of the national conditions, the practical history of the rule of law and the limitation of power.