论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨动脉静脉血血气分析碳酸氢根离子结果对比。方法:基于血气分析仪检测的碳酸氢根离子测定与基于生化分析仪检测的的碳酸氢根离子测定。结果:血气分析仪检测组采用动脉血样进行检测,检测的碳酸氢根离子浓度为(17.93±4.15)mmol/L;而生化分析仪检测组采用静脉血样进行检测,检测的碳酸氢根离子浓度为(18.01±4.14)mmol/L;率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。由此可知,本次研究中生化分析仪检测组采用静脉血样进行检测的碳酸氢根离子浓度略高于血气分析仪检测组采用动脉血样进行检测的值,但是,两组数据之间的差异无统计学意义。同时,对两组数据的相关性进行分析可知,两种检测方式的检测结果存在相关性(r=0.99,P<0.01)。结论:在对患者进行碳酸氢根离子检测时,基于生化分析仪的静脉血样检测其结果与基于血气分析仪的动脉血样检测结果存在较高的相关性,两者可以实现相互代替与相互质量控制。
Objective: To investigate the arterial venous blood gas analysis of bicarbonate ion contrast results. Methods: Determination of bicarbonate ion based on blood gas analyzer and bicarbonate ion based on biochemical analyzer. Results: The blood gas analyzer was detected by arterial blood sample, the bicarbonate ion concentration was (17.93 ± 4.15) mmol / L, while the biochemical analyzer was detected by venous blood sample. The concentration of bicarbonate ion was (18.01 ± 4.14) mmol / L, respectively; there was no significant difference in the rates between the two groups (P> 0.05). It can be seen that in this study, biochemical analyzer test group using venous blood samples for the detection of bicarbonate ion concentration slightly higher than the blood gas analyzer test group using arterial blood samples for the detection value, however, the difference between the two sets of data without Statistical significance. Meanwhile, the correlation between the two groups of data shows that there is a correlation between the two test results (r = 0.99, P <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: There is a high correlation between the results of venous blood tests based on biochemical analyzers and the results of arterial blood tests based on blood gas analyzers when performing bicarbonate ion tests on patients, both of which can achieve mutual replacement and mutual quality control .