论文部分内容阅读
C先生:40多年来,两德形成了不同的法律和经济状况。原西德在战后主要基于市场经济,即私有制与自由市场经营,这是经济动力。美、英、法等占领国曾试图取消德国的大型康采恩,但最后还是保留了一部分为国有,如邮政、铁路、公共供应企业等。1983年后,政府重新私有化,比如大众汽车公司、沙茨根特公司等,股票非常分散。原因是政府认为企业股票分散到私人手里,一旦面对私有,企业就会着力去创造尽可能多的效益;而国家则应做私有企业无法做到的事情,比如改善公共设施等。经验证明,国家如操纵或包揽经济,可
C: For more than 40 years, Germany and Germany have taken different legal and economic conditions. The former West Germany was mainly based on a market economy after the war, that is, private ownership and free market management were the driving forces. The occupying Power such as the United States, Britain and France tried to cancel the large-scale Herzegger in Germany. In the end, however, it retained some of its state-owned enterprises such as postal services, railways and public supply enterprises. After 1983, the government privatization, such as Volkswagen, Schatz Gent, the stock is very scattered. The reason is that the government believes that the corporate stock is dispersed into private hands. Once privately owned, the enterprises will strive to create as much benefit as possible. The state should do something that private enterprises can not do, such as improving public facilities. Experience shows that countries like manipulating or sweeping the economy can