论文部分内容阅读
一直以来,我国都是靠对驾驶员血液当中的酒精含量进行测试作为定案的标准,也就是说对于血液当中的酒精含量进行鉴定已经成为我们进行醉驾案定案的最为关键的依据。对于血液当中的酒精含量进行鉴定只有排除合理的怀疑,最终的结果才能够具有法律效力。而且在鉴定的意见形成过程当中,必须遵守专门性、中立性以及必要性的相关原则。而且还要保证在不存在一些无法进行排除的怀疑的前提之下,来更好的证明其客观性。由于驾驶权本身是一种在法律许可的范围内的特别权力,其不属于自然权利的范畴。如果驾驶员拒不配合进行检查其体内的酒精含量,交通警察可以根据自身的合理怀疑对于驾驶员采取必要的强制手段,比如强制进行检查以及测试等等。而采用此种方式所获取到的证据其合法性不存在疑问。如果采用强制方式进行采集检验的酒精含量的最终鉴定的结果在合法性以及客观性上存在疑问则需要严格按照《刑事诉讼法》当中关于无罪推定的基本原则来对于驾驶员进行无罪处理。
All along, our country relies on testing the alcohol content of the driver’s blood as the standard of finalization. In other words, the identification of the alcohol content in the blood has become the most crucial basis for determining the drunk driving case. The identification of the alcohol content in the blood can only be legally binding if reasonable doubt is excluded. And in the process of forming the opinion, we must abide by the principles of specificity, neutrality and necessity. But also to ensure that its objectivity is better proved without any doubt that can not be excluded. Since the driving right itself is a special right within the scope of the law, it does not belong to the category of natural rights. If the driver refuses to cooperate to check the alcohol content in his body, the traffic police can take necessary coercive measures for the driver according to his own reasonable suspicion, such as forcing inspection and testing. However, there is no doubt as to the validity of the evidence obtained in this way. If the result of the final identification of the alcohol content of a mandatory test collection is questionable in terms of legality and objectivity, the driver should be innocent in strict accordance with the basic principles of presumption of innocence in the Code of Criminal Procedure.