“其在万乘”条，标点值得一议；“逮尼父之卒”条，有两处可作校字之议。“至柳妻之诔惠子”句的译文问题；辨证歌文王、颂后稷的篇名，刘勰并未将《诗经》中述祖的颂诗列作诔文；指出“淮雨”的校改问题；“庸器”的训释；论蔡邕碑文的四句之解释；郗、郄二姓，自不应互混，“”应校改为“郗”；碑文的出现晚于诔文，“事先于诔”自应指最早立碑之举；碑文的写法可以接近于铭，可以类似于诔，但铭文、诔文都不能取代碑文，它是独立的文体 “In the million riders,” the punctuation is worth discussing; “Death and Death” article, there are two can be used as a school word. Liu Wen did not classify the eulogize of the ancestor in the Book of Songs as a pamphlet; pointed out the problem of the revision of “Huaiyu” On the explanation of the four sentences of the inscriptions on Cai Yong; 郗, 郄 two surnames, should not be mixed with each other; “” should be changed to “郗”; “ Prior to 诔 ”since should refer to the earliest erection of the monument; written inscriptions can be close to Ming, can be similar to 诔, but inscriptions, 诔文 can not replace the inscription, it is an independent style