论文部分内容阅读
要旨:认定文书收到日是审查当事人提请的复审申请是否成立的重要的程序性要件。在当事人无法提供邮件信封时,商标评审委员会依据商标法实施条例第十条第二款的规定,以发出文书之日起15日作为文书送达日,符合上述法律法规的立法意图以及行政效率和公平的要求。案情当事人:原告(被上诉人):商丘市睢阳区信鑫中小企业投资担保有限公司(下称商丘信鑫公司)。被告(上诉人):国家工商总局商标评审委员会(下称商标评审委员会)。第三人:河南大有丰食品有限公司(下称河
Purposes: finds that the date of receipt of the instrument is an important procedural requirement for reviewing whether the application for review by the parties is established. When the parties are unable to provide e-mail envelopes, the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board, in accordance with the provisions of Paragraph 2 of Article 10 of the Implementing Regulations of the Trademark Law, served a document delivery date of 15 days from the date of issuance of the document, as well as the legislative intent and administrative efficiency in compliance with the aforesaid laws and regulations and Fair requirement. Case: the plaintiff (appellee): Xinyuan SME Investment Guarantee Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Shangqiu Xinxin). Defendant (appellant): SAIC Trademark Review and Adjudication Board (hereinafter referred to as Trademark Review and Adjudication Board). Third person: Henan abundance Food Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as river