臧文君在《填补监督法律空白,完善监督法律体系》一文中指出,长期以来,从国家到地方,注重实体法立法而轻视程序法立法的倾向还没有得到纠正。与经济立法及其他事项的立法相比,监督法以及各项监督程序法律规范已远远地落在后面。由于缺乏监督程序法规,使人大常委会在行使监督方而受到种种限制,主要表现在:一是监督内容方面,地方组织法对县级以上的地方各级人民代表大会行使的15项职权规定比较原则,哪些问题需要经人大讨论和监督,哪些事项属于重大事项等问题,国家法律没有明确的规范,地方立法也没有涉 Zang Wenjun pointed out in his article entitled “Filling in the legal gaps in supervising the law and improving the supervisory legal system” that for a long time, the tendency of paying attention to the legislation of substantive law while neglecting the procedural legislation has not been corrected from the state to the local government. Compared with the legislation of economic legislation and other issues, the law of supervision as well as the legal norms of various supervision procedures have lagged far behind. Due to the lack of supervisory procedures and laws and regulations, the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress exerts various restrictions on the exercise of supervisory authority. The main features are as follows: First, to supervise the content, the local organizational laws compare the 15 rules of authority exercised by the local people’s congresses at or above the county level Principle, what issues need to be discussed and supervised by the NPC, what matters belong to major issues and other issues, national laws do not have a clear norms, nor the local legislation