论文部分内容阅读
[德国《原子经济》1994年第3期第171页报道] 国际能源机构(IEA)和欧洲核能机构(NEA)受经济合作与发展组织(OECD)的委托,对将于2000年投入运行的不同类型电厂电费(千瓦小时)进行了预算比较。对法国、德国、日本、俄罗斯、匈牙利、印度和韩国的调查比较表明,核能在这些国家仍是经济的。而在那些直接获得廉价煤的国家(如美国部分地区、加拿大西部和中国西北部),或能获取天然气的国家(如英国和荷兰)则是例外。在被调研的大多数国
[Atomic Economy in Germany, Issue 3, 1994, p. 171] The International Energy Agency (IEA) and the European Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA), commissioned by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Type Electricity costs (kWh) Budget Comparison. A survey of France, Germany, Japan, Russia, Hungary, India and South Korea shows that nuclear energy is still economically viable in these countries. The exception is those countries that have direct access to cheap coal, such as parts of the United States, western Canada and northwestern China, or countries that have access to natural gas, such as the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. In most of the countries surveyed