论文部分内容阅读
以北京市健身气功站点和瑜伽俱乐部为研究对象,运用文献资料法、问卷调查法及数据统计法对二者的组织性质、教学者和习练者进行比较研究。结果显示:1)健身气功站点属于政府管理型体育组织,以福利型事业模式推广;教学者有严格的师资认证,为义务教学;习练者多为年龄较大、文化程度较低、收入较低的离、退休人群;健身气功功法内容科学、合理。2)瑜伽俱乐部属于市场主导型体育组织;教学者没有统一的师资认证,为有偿服务;习练者多为文化程度较高、收入较高的中青年女性;教学内容多为俱乐部或教师自己制定,缺乏科学性、标准性。
Take Beijing Health Qigong Station and Yoga Club as the research object, comparative study on the nature of the organization, teachers and practitioners by means of literature review, questionnaire survey and data statistics. The results showed that: 1) Health Qigong sites belonged to government-run sports organizations, promoted by the welfare-oriented business model; teachers had strict teacher certification and were compulsory; most of them were older, less educated and more profitable Low, retired people; Health Qigong power law content is scientific and reasonable. 2) Yoga clubs are market-oriented sports organizations; teaching staff do not have uniform teacher certification and are paid services; most of them are middle-aged and young women with higher education and higher incomes; and most of the teaching contents are formulated by clubs or teachers themselves , Lack of scientific, standard.