档案工作走上正规以来,在一年一度的文书立卷归档工作过程中,往往需要对本年度全宗档案的情况写一个“说明”,通常称之为“全宗介绍”或“全宗说明”。但近年来,有的同仁认为这种称谓不妥,并将其改称为“立卷说明”,甚至在工作检查中,还口头要求下属单位也要相应改过来。其理由主要是因为这种“说明”是在每年立卷过程中形成的,它只反映了全宗内单个年度的情况,而不是全面情况。为区别反映全面情况的“全宗说明”,故只能称为“立卷说明”。笔者不赞同这种意见,建议还是称“全宗说明”为好。 一、分年度编写《全宗说明》的由来。在50——70年代,甚至更晚一些时 Since the archival work has been formally carried out, it is often necessary to write a “statement” on the situation of the Fonds in this year’s Fong Zong file, which is often referred to as “Introduction to the Fontaine” or “Statement of the Fonds” . However, in recent years, some of my colleagues think that this title is not proper and that it is renamed as the “Legislative Instructions”. Even during the work inspection, the subordinate units also verbally requested that they be changed accordingly. The reason for this is mainly because such “instructions” are formed during the process of winding up each year, and it only reflects the situation in a single year in the Fonds, not the overall situation. For the sake of distinguishing the “Fonds General Statement” that reflects the overall situation, it can only be called the “Legislative Instructions”. I do not agree with this opinion, it is recommended that the “Fonds description” as well. First, the preparation of “Fonds annotate” the origin of the year. In the 1950s and 1970s, even later