高考命题的专家不仅是命题的行家,而且也是解题的高手,他们对所命的题都进行过深思熟虑的考量,当然也掌握着题的来龙去脉、熟悉各类情形和各种各样的解答。但考虑到课程标准与考试大纲的限制和对中学教学的导向,他们提供的解答往往不是他们的真实想法,而是“违心”提供的通性通法的解答。现以2007年高考试题中解析几何为例,谈谈这方面的问题。 Experts in the college entrance examination propositions are not only experts in propositions, but also masters in problem solving. They have carefully considered the questions they inscribed, and of course they have all the details and explanations of various situations and answers. However, given the limitations of curriculum standards and test syllabuses and their guidance for secondary education, the solutions they provide are often not their real ideas, but rather the answers to the generalized method provided by the author. Take the 2007 college entrance examination exam analysis of geometry as an example, to talk about this issue.