论文部分内容阅读
2000年以后,世界各国海军都进入了新一代水面舰艇的大规模更新换代,这些水面舰艇原本在90年代就应出现,只是因为冷战的结束才推迟了登场时间。与此同时,冷战后的巨大战略战术转变以及以网络中心化为代表的信息时代取代机械时代的技术更替,也使得新一代作战舰艇的发展出现非常多的变数,特别是技术革命的发展使得老旧装备作战能力大幅下降。在这种变革期,任何一个保守的行为都会导致海洋实力的巨大变动。虽然信息化技术不会像传统兵器那样可以制造出直接的杀伤,但是信息化技术所带来大量精确制导弹药的普及和智能化、多样化,直接改变了武器系统的面貌,甚至因为新的特性而出现许多新颖的武器种类。海军舰艇由于有较为恶劣的孤立封闭的作战环境,对新技术的渴求比别的军种更为拘谨,但是海军在作战思想和新技术的尝试上一直都走在各军种前面。冷战结束后的一段时间,世界各国都没有明白如何面对苏联消失所带来的利益变化,甚至于独大的美国都在胜利的自满和骄傲中忽略了迅速接收对手势力这个最重要的成果。2001年的“9·11”事件和伊拉克战争提醒了西方国家,新一代海军的发展方向是在美国的阴影下迅速占领尚未被瓜分的利益。美国还没有将大国政治调整为更现实的有针对性的小国策略,这导致美国在冷战后受到世界各地的敌对和潜意识中的反抗比冷战时期更多。因此,各国在跟随美国海军技术发展的同时,也根据追随或独立或对抗等战略态度而发展是有自我特色的新一代海军。目前,世界上能自行发展海军技术、武器研发和舰艇建造的国家不超过10个,这些国家都具有一定的地区性扩张趋势,因此研究新一代舰艇体系发展趋势,对迅速掌握未来海军发展有着重要的作用。
Since 2000, the navies of all countries in the world have entered a large-scale upgrading of a new generation of surface ships. Originally, these surface ships should have appeared in the 1990s and were delayed because of the end of the cold war. At the same time, the tremendous strategic and tactical changes after the Cold War as well as the technology replacement replaced by the mechanical age in the era of information represented by network centrism have also led to many variables in the development of a new generation of warships. In particular, the technological revolution has made the old Old equipment combat capability dropped significantly. In this period of change, any conservative act will result in a great change in the strength of the sea. Although information technology does not create the direct killings that traditional weapons do, the proliferation and sophistication and diversification of a large number of precision-guided munitions brought by information technology have directly altered the look of the weapon system, and even new features There are many new types of weapons. Navy ships, due to their harsher isolated and closed operating environment, are more cautious about new technologies than other services, but the navy has always been ahead of the various services in its attempts to combat ideology and new technologies. Some time after the end of the Cold War, all countries in the world did not understand how to deal with the changes brought about by the disappearance of the Soviet Union. Even the largest U.S., in its complacency and triumpiness over triumph, ignored the most important result of rapidly receiving opponent forces. The “9.11” incident in 2001 and the war in Iraq reminded the western countries that the direction of the development of the new generation of navies is the rapid occupation of the undisputed interests under the shadow of the United States. The United States has not yet readjusted the politics of a major power into a more realistic and targeted small-country strategy. This has resulted in the United States being more hostile and unconscious in various parts of the world than in the Cold War after the Cold War. Therefore, while following the development of US naval technology, all countries are also developing a new generation of naval forces with their own characteristics based on their strategic attitude of following or independence or antagonism. At present, there are no more than 10 countries in the world that can independently develop naval technology, weapons research and development and naval vessels construction. All of these countries have certain regional expansion trends. Therefore, studying the development trend of the new generation naval vessel system is important for quickly grasping the future naval development Role.