时下、有一种很时髦的说法:从事社会科学研究的人员,应该既当理论家,又当社会活动家。似乎只有如此,才称得上合乎时代要求的人才。此说作为一种美好的愿望,有其可取之处。学界多些“两栖”人物,既有专业才干,又有社交能力,静能孤灯清影,条分缕析,动能雷厉风行,纵横捭阖,实属一件大好事。可是令人很遗憾,播下的是龙种、长出来的多是跳蚤、在现实生活中,真正的社会活动家没几个,“社会忽悠家”(东北地区俗称,用空话、瞎话蒙 Nowadays, there is a very fashionable statement: those engaged in social science research should act as both theorists and social activists. It seems that only then can we meet the requirements of the times. This as a good wish, has its merits. More academic circles “amphibious ” figure, both professional ability, but also social ability, static can solitary lights clear, article analysis, dynamic energy and resolutely, aspect maneuvers, it is a good thing. However, it is very regrettable to sow the dragon species, grow more than fleas, in real life, the real few social activists, “social flicker home ” (northeastern region commonly known as empty words, nonsense Mongolian