蔺相如“完璧归赵”历来被人们称道。明代文学家王世贞却对此质疑,全盘否定,并作《蔺相如完璧归赵论》。王氏认为：“(赵)得其情而畏之则予,得其情而弗畏之则弗予。此两言决耳,奈之何既畏而复挑其怒也!”又说“欲使曲在秦,则莫如弃璧：畏弃璧,则莫如弗予。”还亲自设计了一场献璧后秦不予赵城,蔺相如慷慨陈词以死力争的情景,并说“秦王未必不返璧也。今奈何使舍人怀而逃之,而归直于秦?”最后,王氏以为：“蔺相如之获全于璧也,天也。”对蔺相如“完璧归赵”的大智大勇进行了否定。 Xiang Xiangru has always been praised for his “complete return to Zhao.” Wang Shizhen, a literary writer in the Ming Dynasty, questioned this and completely rejected it. Wang believes: “(Zhao) gets his feelings and he fears them, but if he has his feelings and he fears them, he will give them. These two words will end with the ears, and Chennai will fear it and pick out its anger too!” If you want to make music in the Qin Dynasty, then you must discard it: If you are afraid of abandoning you, you will not be able to elevate it.” They also personally designed a scene in which the dedication was not given to Zhao Cheng and Qin Xiangru’s generous submission to death and struggle. It is not necessary to return to this place. Now, does this cause the people to flee and return to Qin?” In the end, Wang thought: “Yuan Xiangru’s won the all-over anniversaries and the days.” Negated.