清中叶著名学者杭世骏的《订讹类编》及《续补》,不仅汇集了他多年的读书心得,同时也保存了大量其他学者著作中的考证文字,具有丰富的文献学价值。但因杭氏在编纂该书时,《续补》部份的著述体例存在不规范之处,致使有些原本是其他作者著作中的考证文字,被误认为是杭氏本人的读书心得,从而造成研究者的误解,影响到研究结果的准确性。此次研究正欲通过分析《订讹类编》及《续补》的著述体例,揭示致讹之由,从而避免以后的研究产生类似的误解。 Hang Shunjun, a famous scholar in the middle of the Qing dynasty, compiled a series of books and supplements, which not only brought together many years of his reading experience, but also saved a large number of texts from other scholars’ writings and had rich philological value. However, as Hangzhou compiled the book, there was an irregularity in the style of writing in the Continuation Part. As a result, some of the texts originally used in the writings of other authors were mistakenly identified as Hangzhou’s own reading experience, resulting in The researcher’s misunderstanding affects the accuracy of the research results. The study is trying to reveal the causes of the mistakes by analyzing the writing style of “making up the wrong class” and “renewal” so as to avoid similar misunderstandings in future research.