论文部分内容阅读
看报的人都知道,关于战略核导弹,美国在精度、弹头数量及可靠性方面占优势。而苏联在投掷重量、当量及导弹数量方面占有优势。然而,即使你看报时一字不漏,且还能不甚含糊地知道各种指标的优劣势如何导致某一方占有全面的优势,但当任何一方的战略核导弹发生特殊变化时,例如减少了当量而增加了弹头数量,你就无法判断这种变化到底是否合你的心愿。实际上,你会听到许多人在竭力争辩:精度和弹头数量是最要紧的,而另一些人却
Everyone who reads the newspaper knows that with respect to strategic nuclear missiles, the United States has the upper hand in terms of accuracy, quantity of warheads and reliability. The Soviet Union has the advantage of throwing weight, equivalent weight and number of missiles. However, even if you look at the newspapers, and you know with some vagueness how the strengths and weaknesses of the various indicators give one party an overall advantage, when there is a specific change in either party’s strategic nuclear missile, for example, Equivalent and increase the number of warheads, you can not determine whether this change in the end with your wish. In fact, you will hear many people arguing hard that the accuracy and warheads are the most important, while others