第一章西藏远古史一“博”称谓的由来吾侪之境域,最初便唤之为“博”。此称呼如何形成,其内涵又是什么,在西藏王朝史和宗教源流史中没有发现对此术语之解释。近代著名历史学家根顿群培在其所著《自史》中,对此称呼作了最初考证。详细论述参见该原著。其中指出:“所言‘博’一词,诠显何义耶?或是此乃随意立名,无意义可言也。”继而又说:或是将王名立为地名也。如依“雍仲本”教派所见,“谓初名本境,后渐转变成博境。”此等说法尽管作为参考材料提出来,并未断言,然而更使我们赞同这位学者的用意。何况,根据 The first chapter of the ancient history of Tibet a “Bo” appellation origin of my domain, originally called it “Bo.” How this title is formed and what is its connotation? No explanation of this term has been found in the history of Tibetan dynasties and the origins of religions. The well-known historian of ancient times Guntunungen in its book “since the history”, this call made the first textual research. See the original book for a detailed discussion. It states: “The word” Bo “is used to denote He Yi Ye, or it is an arbitrary name, meaningless at all.” He then said: According to “Yongzhong this” sects see, “that the initial name of the territory, then gradually transformed into a Bo state.” Although these statements as a reference material put forward, not asserted, but more so that we agree with the scholar’s intentions. Not to mention, according to