论文部分内容阅读
各国刑法在伪造有价证券罪种类方面的规定上较具一致性,在主观特征方面的规定与见解则不尽相同:伪造、变造行为是伪造有价证券罪的基本行为模式;均注重对与伪造相关联的危害行为的处罚,而且伪造有价证券罪对象范围较为广泛、总体趋于一致;主观特征方面的差异主要袁现在是否要求特定目的以及目的的内容上。我国刑法可适当增加对伪造有价证券犯罪关联行为进行处罚的规定,并且有必要将伪造有价证券罪的主观特征限定为“以使用为目的”。
The criminal law of all countries has more consistency in the provisions on the types of counterfeit securities and the subjective characteristics of the rules and opinions are not the same: forgery, alteration of behavior is the basic behavior of counterfeiting securities; both pay attention to And forgery associated with the punishment of harmful acts, but forged securities for a wider range of crime, the overall tend to be consistent; subjective characteristics of the main differences now whether the request for a specific purpose and purpose of the content. China’s criminal law may appropriately increase the penalties for the criminal association of forged securities, and it is necessary to limit the subjective characteristics of the crime of forging securities to “use for purpose.”