在上海的一次法庭辩论上,“汉字全息码”作者及其监护人提出,自然杂志社交给上海交大测试的“全息码”码本与交给北京测试的“全息码”码本有某些不同,从而引起人们的疑问。其实,对“全息码”本身进行分析研究,就可以把错码的成因和事实真相了解清楚。“全息码”在1989年年底的专利申请书中,声称其重码率低于千分之一。然而奇怪的是,既然是这么好的编码,却在短短三四个月内,作了两次大幅度的 At a court hearing in Shanghai, the author of “Chinese Character Holographic Codes” and his guardian suggested that the “holographic code” codebook that Natural Magazine handed over to Shanghai Jiaotong University for testing was somewhat different from the “hologram code” codebook that was handed over to Beijing for testing. Which caused people’s questions. In fact, the analysis of the “hologram code” itself, we can make the wrong code and the facts understand the truth. “Holographic code” in the end of 1989 the patent application, claiming that its code rate less than one per thousand. However, it is strange that since it is such a good code, it has made two significant changes in just three or four months