论文部分内容阅读
在我国刑事诉讼中,侦查强制措施大致可以分为人身性和财产性两类,长期以来理论和实践,忽视了对诸如查封、扣押、冻结等财产性侦查措施的监督。刑事搜查、扣押等活动直接关系着公民的私有财产权、人身自由权、住宅安宁权以及隐私权等,监督的缺失使得侦查中侵犯当事人财产权利的现象较为突出,检察机关应当探索强化对财产性侦查措施监督的路径、程序和方式。
In China’s criminal proceedings, investigation coercive measures can be divided into two categories: personal and property, which have long been theoretically and practically neglected the supervision of such property investigation measures as seizure, seizure and freezing. Criminal search, seizure and other activities are directly related to citizens’ private property rights, personal freedom rights, housing tranquility rights and privacy rights. The lack of supervision makes the phenomenon of infringement on the property rights of the parties more prominent during the investigation. Procuratorial agencies should explore ways to strengthen the investigation of property crimes Measures to monitor the path, procedures and methods.