论文部分内容阅读
某市一个“T”型路口,发生一起交通事故。行人刘某由西向东横穿马路,行至中间,与一辆由南向北行驶的小客车相撞。刘某脾脏出血.送医院抢救无效于次日下午死亡。经交警现场勘察和调查取证认定,小客车超速.观察不够.行人未走人行横道.双方负同等事故责任。对此,双方表示无异议。事过一个月后,公交公司突然接到法院的传票。事故双方诉公交公司在事故发生处停放两辆公交车.影响了双方的视线,导致双方判断失误,造成事故,应负一定的责任。
A city of a “T” junctions, a traffic accident. Pedestrian Ryu cross the road from west to east, line to the middle, collided with a small passenger car traveling from south to north. Liu spleen bleeding to hospital for invalid rescue died the next afternoon. The traffic police scene investigation and investigation and evidence collection, passenger cars speeding. Observation is not enough. Pedestrians did not take the pedestrian crossing. Both sides bear the same responsibility for the accident. In this regard, both parties expressed no objection. A month later, the bus company suddenly summoned the court summons. Both parties complained that the bus companies parked two buses at the accident site, which affected the sight of both parties and caused both sides to make mistakes and cause accidents, and they should bear certain responsibilities.