论文部分内容阅读
交易费用理论具有强大的解释力,但是当前的研究忽略了其对司法裁判的作用。笔者认为,交易费用范式在司法裁判中有助于法官更好地进行法律解释和价值判断,在疑难案件中选择更好的裁判规则。本文通过公司司法解散制度的例示,对如何在司法裁判中运用交易费用范式进行了初步的探讨。笔者的观点是,在公司司法解散制度案件中,法院需要审查困难是否构成及其严重程度如何,但是仅从法教义学的视角难以得到明确的指引,结合交易费用理论,可以认为司法解散制度的目的主要在于强制内部组织成本过高以至于失去效率优势的企业退出市场,依此,效率优势的丧失也就成为法官在案件中应当着重考察的因素。由于目前我国解散之诉的判例仍然较少,司法经验尚未完善,进一步的研究仍有待交易成本的细化分析以及未来更多判例的检验,然而本文作为一个研究的开端,主要创新在于提出了交易费用范式的实务意义,这对于我国公司法解释的研究是必要和可行的。
The theory of transaction costs has strong explanatory power, but current research neglects its role in judicial adjudication. The author believes that the paradigm of transaction costs in judicial decisions will help judges better legal interpretation and value judgments in difficult cases, choose a better rule of referee. This article through the judicial dissolution of the system of examples, how to use the transaction costs paradigm in judicial adjudication conducted a preliminary discussion. The author’s point of view is that in the case of judicial dissolution of the company, the court needs to examine whether the difficulty is constituted and its severity. However, it is difficult to obtain a clear guideline only from the perspective of legal education and the theory of transaction costs, the judicial dissolution system The main purpose is to force the cost of internal organization is too high to lose the efficiency advantage of enterprises out of the market, thus, the loss of efficiency advantage has become the judge in the case should focus on inspection factors. At present, there are still a few judicial precedents in our country and the judicial experience has not been perfected yet. Further research is still subject to the detailed analysis of transaction costs and the test of more cases in the future. However, as a starting point for the study, the main innovation lies in the proposed transaction The practical significance of the cost paradigm is necessary and feasible for the study of the interpretation of the company law in our country.