不知什么原因,阅遍不同专家学者对鲁迅经典杂文《拿来主义》的解读,我们看到的总是对文中的用语造句的分析理解,但几乎没有人分析“拿来”怎么成了“主义”。而且,学识渊博的鲁迅为什么不以中国古代文化经典或欧美强国文化的实例来阐述如何对待中外文化遗产的问题,而去设喻老宅子的继承?发疯最后致死且自诩“自己是太阳,光热无穷”的尼采 I do not know why, read by different experts and scholars on the classic Lunxun Lu Xun’s “fetishism” interpretation, we always see the text of the sentence to analyze and understand, but few people analyze “Doctrine ”. Moreover, why did not the learned Lu Xun elaborate how to deal with the problems of Chinese and foreign cultural heritages with the examples of the ancient Chinese cultural classics or the European and American power cultures, instead of describing the inheritance of the old Zuizi? Light and Infinite "Nietzsche