论文部分内容阅读
[目的]了解广东省城市和农村公共厕所卫生与设施状况,发现存在的主要问题,为《公共厕所卫生标准》的修订提供依据。[方法]2009年7月,在梅州市采用现场询问和入厕调查相结合的方法对100个公共厕所进行调查。[结果]调查100个公厕,城市水冲式占82.00%,农村三格式占56.00%;给水方式为自来水的占97.00%;城市点与农村点公厕室内地面平均面积分别为60.59 m2、33.46 m2,蹲位数分别为13.26、7.16个;公厕内便器材质为陶瓷的占93.00%,地面为瓷砖的占91.00%;自然通风的占58.00%;城市点公厕卫生和管理状况明显优于农村点公厕;公厕的防滑设施、蹲位面积及数量设置比较合理。[结论]广东省公共厕所整体条件尚可,但还存在一定的问题,尤其是农村公厕的卫生和管理水平欠缺,政府应加大公厕的经费投入。
[Objective] To understand the status of public toilets and toilets in urban and rural areas of Guangdong Province and to find out the main problems and provide the basis for the revision of “Public toilets hygiene standards”. [Method] In July 2009, a total of 100 public toilets were investigated in Meizhou using a combination of on-site inquiry and toilet investigation. [Results] 100 public toilets were investigated, 82.00% of urban water rushes, 56.00% of rural three forms, and 97.00% of water supply ways of running water. The average indoor ground surface area of public toilets in urban and rural areas were respectively 60.59 m2 and 33.46 m2, The number of squatting seats was 13.26 and 7.16 respectively. The toilet materials in public toilets accounted for 93.00% for ceramics, 91.00% for floor tiles and 58.00% for natural ventilation. The health and management status of public toilets in urban areas was significantly better than that of rural public toilets. Non-slip toilet facilities, squatting area and the number of settings is more reasonable. [Conclusion] The overall condition of public toilets in Guangdong Province is acceptable, but there are still some problems, especially the lack of hygiene and management in rural public toilets. The government should increase the funding for public toilets.