论文部分内容阅读
一最近十来年,文艺学学科先后出现了多部学术史论著,比如陈传才主编的《文艺学百年》(1999),杜书瀛、钱竞主编的《中国20世纪文艺学学术史》(2001),毛庆耆、董学文、杨福生主编的《中国文艺理论百年教程》(2004),程正民、程凯撰写的《中国现代文学理论知识体系的构建——文学理论教材与教学的历史沿革》(2005),童庆炳主编的《新时期高校文学理论教材编写调查报告》(2006),董学文、金永兵主编的《中国当代文学理论》(2008)等。对于文艺学学术史的写作而言,无论是谈论20世纪的学者、学术研究方法,还是理论研究的进展、马克思主义理论家、马克思主义的方法以及马克思主义方法指导下的研究成果,都不仅无法绕开,而且在多数时间里
For example, Chen Chuan-cai’s “A Century of Literature and Art” (1999), Du Shuying and Qian Jing’s “Academic History of Chinese 20th Century Literature and Art” (2001), Mao The History of Chinese Literary Theory Textbook and Teaching (2005) written by Cheng Qingmin and Cheng Kai in “Centennial Tutorial of Chinese Literature and Art Theory” (2004), edited by Qing Qingqi, Dong Xuewen and Yang Fusheng, Survey Report on the Compilation of New Textbooks for College Literary Theories (2006) edited by Tong Qingbing, Dong Xuewen and Jin Yongbing (Contemporary Literary Theory of China) (2008). For the writing of the academic history of literary arts, no matter whether it is to talk about scholars, academic research methods or the progress of theoretical research in the 20th century, not only can Marxist theoreticians, Marxist methods and research results under the guidance of Marxist methods fail Around, and most of the time