论文部分内容阅读
民事庭审在整个诉讼活动中处于核心地位,其中,庭审方式改革是诉讼改革的重要内容.本文重点对民事庭审方式中的法庭调查与法庭辩论两阶段的分与合进行了分析,认为两阶段分离的构造已经完成了历史使命,现阶段,这种分离不仅割裂了案件调查与事实问题、法律问题辩论的关联性,也在一定程度上限制了当事人质证权的行使,从而限制了庭审功能的最大发挥。本文认为应将两阶段予以合并,并对合并后的庭审方式提出了一些建议.
Civil trial plays a central role in the entire litigation activity, of which the reform of the trial method is an important part of the litigation reform.This paper focuses on the analysis of the two phases of court investigation and forensic debate in the civil court trial, Has already completed its historical mission. At present, this separation not only separates the investigation of the case from the factual issue and the connection of the debates on legal issues, but also to a certain extent limits the exercise of the parties’ right of falsification and thus limits the maximum hearing function Play This paper argues that the two phases should be merged, and some suggestions are put forward for the merged trial method.