论文部分内容阅读
自2011年5月1日刑法修正案(八)正式施行以来,最高人民法院针对刑法总则修改内容的时间效力问题发布司法解释,及时明确了相关溯及力原则与适用规范。在司法实务中,围绕具体犯罪的溯及力问题仍然存在一些适用争议,有待厘清。笔者结合前几次刑法修正案的有关修订内容予以研究。一、如何界定新罪行根据罪刑法定原则及刑法第十二条的规定,刑法
Since the formal implementation of the Criminal Law Amendment (8) of May 1, 2011, the Supreme People’s Court has issued a judicial interpretation on the issue of the time validity of the content of the General Provisions on the Criminal Law, clarifying in time the relevant principles and applicable norms of retroactivity. In judicial practice, there still exist some applicable disputes around the retroactivity of specific crimes, which need to be clarified. The author combined with the previous amendments to the Criminal Law to amend the content to be studied. First, how to define a new crime According to the principle of legality and criminal law Article XII of the Criminal Law