论文部分内容阅读
近几年来,有一批青、中年剧作家立志在创作上开拓一条新路,以打破话剧舞台因循守旧的沉闷空气。他们从内容到形式、从生活到艺术进行了艰苦的探索和勇敢的创造,写出了一批新作品。探索有可能失误,创造不一定成功。这样,就引起了话剧评论界的广泛重视与不同观点的争鸣。评论也是一种探讨,并非就是结论。由于生活观念、戏剧观念和审美观念的差异,对一个剧目的看法,自然也有不同的意见,这是正常的。值得我们思考的是:为什么这些创新之作,几乎每个都引起争论?为什么争论的焦点,都几乎集中在生活真实问题、艺术典型问题、时代精神问题以及艺术形式问题上面?希望我们的剧作家和评论家,进一步解放思想、实事求是地来对待这些创作实践和理论探讨中的问题,进一步携起手来,互相学习,互相探讨,互相帮助,为繁荣戏剧创作和理论研究作出各自的贡献。我们期待读者、作者、评论工作者都来联系创作实际,围绕这几个主要问题,进行深入的探讨。
In recent years, a group of young and middle-aged dramatists have determined to explore a new path in their creative endeavors so as to break the dull air of the conservative stage of the drama. From content to form, from life to art, they conducted painstaking exploration and courageous creation, and wrote a number of new works. Exploration may be mistakes, creation may not be successful. In this way, it has aroused widespread criticism of the drama critics and contend with different views. Commentary is also a discussion, not a conclusion. Due to the difference in concept of life, concept of theater and concept of aesthetics, it is natural that there should be different opinions on one repertoire. It is worth pondering why almost all of these innovations cause controversy and why the focus of controversy has focused almost exclusively on the issues of real life, the typical problems of the arts, the spirit of the times, and the problems of the art form. We hope that our dramatists And critics, to further emancipate the mind, to seek truth from facts and theoretical issues in these practices and theoretical discussions, to further join hands to learn from each other, to explore each other and help each other, for the prosperity of theater creation and theoretical research to make their own contribution. We look forward to readers, authors, commentators have to contact the actual creation, around these several major issues, in-depth discussion.