莫洛亚在给英国女作家弗吉尼亚·伍尔夫写的评传里写道:“时间是唯一的批评家,它有着无可争辩的权威:它可以使当时看来是坚实牢靠的荣誉化为泡影,也可以使人们曾经觉得是脆弱的声望巩固下来。”这后半句话,我觉得完全可以移用在本世纪三四十年代这样一些中国作家、批评家和他们的作品身上,这是一群被指称为京派的文学家,他们曾经与新文学的发展联系在一起的命运,以及为“重造文学经典”作出过的诸多努力,由于种种一言难尽的原因,曾被长久地漠视,甚至一再地遭到过有意的误解。最近十数年来,由于时间这位权威批评家的出场,这些曾遭漠视和误解的一切,作为一种不争的事实,正在逐渐地昭然于世,越来越成为有志于 In his commentary on the British woman writer Virginia Woolf, Moroxa wrote: “Time is the only critic who has the indisputable authority that it can turn the glory of what appeared to be solid and solid at the time But also to consolidate the prestige that people once felt vulnerable to. ”After a few words, I think it is entirely possible to move away from such Chinese writers, critics and their works of the 1930s and 1940s as a group The writers who are alleged to be Beijing school, the fate they once had associated with the development of new literature, and the many efforts made to “re-create the literary classics” have long been disregarded for a long time, and have repeatedly Has been intentionally misunderstood. In the recent ten years, due to the appearance of time as the authoritative critic, all these things that have been neglected and misunderstood have gradually become manifestly unconscionable and increasingly become sought-after