论文部分内容阅读
集资房是我国由计划经济向市场经济转轨过程中过渡性政策下的产物。由于我国规制集资房买卖的法律法规滞后,集资房买卖合同效力的认定在理论上和实践中存在不同的认识和做法。法院在处理集资房买卖合同效力纠纷时认定买卖合同有效或无效的情形时常发生,更有甚者,有的法院将集资房买卖纠纷排除在法院的受案范围外,这些不统一的做法造成了极大的负面影响。为鼓励交易和维护交易稳定,应重视对合同效力的保护,不轻易确认合同无效。
Fund-raising houses are the product of China's transitional policy from a planned economy to a market economy. Due to the lag of the laws and regulations regulating the sale and purchase of fund-raising houses in our country, the cognizance of the validity of the contract for the sale and purchase of fund-raising houses has different theories and practices. Courts dealt with the dispute over the validity of contracts for the sale and purchase of wsfs. It often happens that the contract of sale and purchase is valid or invalid. What is more, some courts exclude the sale and purchase disputes of wsf from the scope of the courts. These non-uniform practices result in Great negative impact. In order to encourage the transaction and maintain the stability of the transaction, attention should be paid to the protection of the validity of the contract, and it is not easy to confirm that the contract is invalid.