论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨热牙胶根管充填方法用于磨牙根管充填的临床疗效,提高牙痛患者的生命质量。方法:对在我院自2011年1月至2013年1月接受治疗的80例牙髓痛或根尖周病患者(患牙80颗)资料进行回顾性分析,将他们随即分为两组,一组为实验组,另一组为对照组;实验组采用热牙胶根管方法充填;对照组则采用冷牙胶根管方法充填。对两组患者的根管充填时间和根管数目进行比较,在患者手术6个月后进行复查一次,并对复查结果认真记录。结果:患者手术6个月后,实验组患者中有39例患者充填成功,1例患者充填失败;对照组患者中3l例患者充填成功,9例患者充填失败;实验组每根管平均充填时间为67.8秒;对照组每根管平均充填时间为185.8。结论:热牙胶根管充填方法用于磨牙根管充填的疗效与冷牙胶根管充填方法相比有明显优势,临床操作方法简便且操作时间也较短。
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical effect of hot-tooth gel filling method on root canal filling and improve the quality of life of patients with toothache. Methods: The data of 80 cases of dental pulp pain or periapical periodontitis (80 teeth) treated in our hospital from January 2011 to January 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into two groups, One group was experimental group and the other group was control group. The experimental group was filled with hot-dentin root canal method while the control group was filled with cold-tooth gel root canal method. The time of root canal filling and the number of root canal were compared between the two groups. The patients were reviewed after 6 months and the results of the review were carefully recorded. Results: Six months after operation, 39 patients in the experimental group were successfully filled, and 1 patient failed to fill. In the control group, 31 patients were successfully filled and 9 patients failed to fill. The average filling time of each tube in the experimental group For 67.8 seconds; control group, the average filling time of each tube was 185.8. Conclusion: The effect of hot-tooth gel root canal filling method for root canal filling is superior to cold-tooth root canal filling method. The clinical operation method is simple and the operation time is short.