一、问题的提出所谓使用性盗窃,是指行为人基于返还的意思,未经允许而私自暂时性地使用他人财物的行为,属于民法理论所说的无权使用(furtum usus)的表现类型之一,与之相似的还有使用性侵占行为。我国刑法理论通说认为,使用性盗窃并不具有盗窃罪的刑事可罚性,因为行为人并不具有非法占有目的,缺乏成立盗窃罪的主观构成要件要素(否定说)。[1]但近来有少数学者认为,使用性盗窃并非一概不具有刑事可罚性,当造成了相当利用可能性的妨害[2]或者导致他人财物遭受较大折损消耗[3]时,同样应作为 First, the issue put forward The so-called use of theft refers to the act of the return of people based on the idea of ​​unauthorized use of others and property temporarily privately belong to civil law theory that the right to use (furtum usus) performance type First, there is a similar use of sexual assassination. The theory of criminal law in our country says that the use of sexual theft does not have the criminal punishability of theft, because the actor does not have the purpose of illegal possession, and lacks the elements of the subjective constitution of theft (the negative argument). Recently, however, a few scholars think that the use of sexual theft does not mean that there is no criminal penalties. When the use of the theft caused by the possibility of use [2], or lead to a greater loss of property suffered [3], the same Should be as