在美术创作上我算是有创新的人,但在基础美术教学上,却不敢轻言改革。前辈们拥有丰富的教学经验,培养出几代大师,足以证明他们的教学方法确有可取之处。因此,那些为了标榜自己的独出心裁,把前辈们总结的经验,随意肢解、简化的方式难免失之偏颇,如再白纸黑字地印成著作未免误人子弟。技出多门漏洞百出当今,有关美术技法的书可谓汗牛充栋,各门各派异彩纷呈。然而,从理论、观点到技法等方面多不尽如人意,甚至在同一套书里,有时理论也自相矛盾之处。我曾将近年来不同出版社出版的素描技法书进行比较,同一内容,如对素描的五大调子的解释,十个出版社出版的书就 I am an innovative person in art creation, but I can not stress the reform in basic art teaching. Predecessors have a wealth of teaching experience, training generations of masters, enough to prove that their teaching methods have merit. Therefore, in order to flaunt their own uniqueness, the experience summarized by their predecessors, indiscriminate and simplistic ways will inevitably be biased, such as writing in vain on the books as mistaken children. Many skills out of loopholes Today, the book on art techniques can be described as sweeping, various factions colorful. However, theories, ideas and techniques are far from satisfactory. Even in the same book, sometimes the theory is contradictory. I have compared sketching techniques published by different publishers in recent years. The same content, such as the explanation of the five major elements of sketches, and the books published by ten publishing houses