拿98分,抽一巴掌;得61分,送一香吻。惩罚和奖励完全依据孩子的分数,根本不管孩子基础咋样,临场发挥如何,更别说关注孩子的学习过程了。评价标准单一,评价方式僵化,评价主体唯一……总之一句话,这种功利、封闭、静态的评价观,最终不是促进了学生的发展,而是阻碍了学生的成长。没有评价的科学何来科学的评价?可怕的是现实生活中,这样的评价比比皆是。在高校,硕士、博士研究生要毕业首先需要在一 Take 98 points, pumping a slap; 61 points to send a kiss. Penalties and rewards are based solely on the child’s score, regardless of how the child is based, how they play, let alone the child’s learning process. The evaluation criteria are single, the evaluation method is rigid and the evaluation subject is the only one. In a word, this utilitarian, closed and static evaluation not only promoted the development of students but also hindered the students’ growth. Scientists have no scientific evaluation of how scientific? Terrible is that in real life, such evaluations abound. In colleges and universities, master’s and doctoral students need to graduate in the first place